We Are Here! We Are Here! We Are Here! We Are Here!

Against my better judgment, I'm going to be a grumpy bug today and blog about something I probably shouldn't.

I'm sure you're wondering what. Well, you'll have to read on to find out.

I know I'm not the only one feeling this way. I also realize there's really no one to blame. Except the economy, maybe. We can always blame the economy.

But the truth of the matter is, the publishing industry, which used to move at glacial speeds, has slowed down even more (if that's possible). Publishers have restructured--in other words, laid off a bunch of people--and editors have had to pick up the slack. To make matters more complicated, plenty of those laid off people have turned to the agent side of the business, so now there are more agents, and, therefore, more agented material going out to those already swamped editors. Agented submissions used to have a turnaround rate of 6 to 8 weeks tops. Now it's 4 to 6 months or more (take mine, for example, which has been on submission since August--yes, August). And the slush pile? I have some writing friends who have been waiting over a YEAR for word on their unsolicited submissions.

And, though I don't really blame anyone (honestly, I don't), I do kinda feel like the Mayor of Whoville from Horton Hears a Who. Those of us on submission keep yelling, "We are here! We are here! We are here! We are here!" But it feels like we're not being heard--or in this case, read.

I keep hoping for that one little "Yopp!" from Jo-Jo that will open the floodgates.

Come on, Jo-Jo. Where are you?

My Social Networking Experiement

Okay, so most of my readers have probably had time to view the post from Friday, daring you you leave a comment.

What I didn't mention was that I was conducting an experiment. Though, I bet you all probably guessed that. I have very smart readers, you know.

The experiment was to see how many people would actually leave a comment after reading the dare. But I didn't just do this experiment on both my blogs. I also left this same message on my FB wall (I left two messages there, in fact), on Twitter (actually, I tweeted it three times throughout the day), and on my Utah Children's Writers Yahoo! group. And I also dared people from Verla Kay's blueboards to read my blog post though I didn't tell them what it said.

And here's the data I collected on Friday:

THIS BLOG had 32 unique visitors on Friday. Out of those 32 visitors, 4 left a message. Only one blogged about my dare.

MY LJ BLOG had 34 unique visitors on Friday. Out of those 34 visitors, 6 left a message. One left a message saying she would blog about my dare on Monday (today), which she did.

MY FB WALL had...well, I'm not sure how to check those figures. But I have 64 friends so theoretically all of them could have seen the message. Only three commented.

MY TWITTER had...well, again, I'm not sure how to check the figures. But I had 116 followers on Friday who could have seen the three messages I left throughout the day. Two commented, one retweeted.

MY YAHOO! GROUP has a few hundred members. No one left a message there. Though one did click on the link to my blog, but didn't leave a message as far as I could tell.

THE BLUEBOARDS is a bit harder to figure out. There are about 4000 people who are members, and I'm sure a million more who can view the boards, so I really have no idea how many read my message under the "What did you blog about today?" thread. But I had three people from the boards visit on Friday, though not all came from that thread but other threads I've posted on the boards. And since most of my blog friends are also members of the boards, it's hard to tell if any of those people who left a message did so because of reading my post on the boards, or because they routinely read my blog.

So, there you have it. All the data I collected Friday. But what does it tell us?

Well, first of all, it tells us that I am not anywhere near ready to take over the world. (Or is that change the world? I can never remember.) I mean, if only 100 or so people can read my messages, I am clearly not reaching the masses. Those are actually quite pathetic numbers that I hope the rest of you forget as soon as you stop reading this post.

Second of all, I need to work on my inspirational leadership skills. If I can't even get my readers to leave a simple comment, then quite clearly I have not yet figured out how to inspire my followers. (Or is that minions? I can never remember.)

And thirdly, I really don't care a fig about the numbers. I put those here for those of you who like statistics and probability and neat rows of columned numbers. You're welcome.

For me, the real success of my experiment came from what happened in me. You see, when I posted my experiment, I felt a little rush of excitement, and just a bit of recklessness. In fact, I felt like a kid again.

And I can imagine that those who commented felt just a tiny bit of that same nostalgia. Who remembers childhood dares? Anyone? I certainly do. And my little experiment reminded me of those feelings. And that is really what I got out of this experiment. I got in touch with a part of me from those old days. Which is right where I want to be as I get to work on my MG manuscript.

So, thanks everyone, for the successful experiment that helped me get in touch with part of my inner child. Now I dare you to go out and do your own experiment. You'll thank me for it later. (Or is that swear undying loyalty to me as Empress of the World? I can never remember.)

Will You?

Go ahead, dear blog readers. I dare you to leave a comment below.

And for the really brave people, I dare you to blog, FB, tweet, or send emails telling others about my dare (linking back to this blog post, of course), and then leave a separate comment below telling me you did it.

Go ahead. I dare you.

The Times (and My Blog) They Are A-Changin'

A few days ago, one of my blueboard friends kindly pointed out my links weren't working on this blog (thanks, gim!). I mean, I had kinda noticed and all, but I didn't think anyone paid attention to that kind of thing.

Well, apparently they do.

So I've downloaded another template and spiffied up the place. Welcome to the new look!

Let's hope this one doesn't have any bugs. Let me know if it does, though, okay?


And in honor of spring, and my new blog look, and all things that are a-changin', I'd like to make an official announcement:

(No, my book has not sold.)

Ahem!

I've decided this bloggy wog of mine needs more than a freshly painted face. SO... (drumroll please)...I'm in the process of revamping the inside as well. This place needs more umph and razzle dazzle, more sparkle and shine. I'm tired of hosting this snoozefest. Instead I want to change the world! (Or is that take over the world? I can never remember.)

So be watching for more meaningful content soon. You know, things that matter. Like contests for free books, guest bloggers who are awesomer than me (yes, awesomer is now an official word--because I say so), and even an interview with Agent Man. If I'm lucky, I might find ways to do more interviews as well, since I love me a good interview. And maybe, just maybe, I'll try that vlog thing. (Scary.)

Did I mention contests for free books? Just making sure.

So spread the word to all your friends and family. Because soon....this is gonna be The Place To Be. Trust me on this.

Contests! Contests! Get Your Free Contest Entries!

Here's a few contests you should all know about:

1.

My brand new LJ friend ellestrauss is hosting a contest in honor of signing with her agent. She's giving away books to those who guess the correct time she has locked in her time vault. You can read more about it and enter here. Contest is open to US/CAN residents, and ends Sunday, March 14th.

2.

Long time LJ friend karenbschwartz is hosting an inspirational contest. She wants to know what inspires you, and two lucky winners will receive a free book. Read more and enter here. Contest ends Thursday, March 4th, so hurry!

3.

And don't forget March Madness, hosted by denisejaden , shanasilver , ellestrauss , and Jen Hayley ! Though a month long, you will be entered to win some fabulous books there as well. See my previous post here to get the dish on what's happening with this contest.

4.

Cindy Pon is giving away two books, just because. Contest runs through Sunday, March 7th. Contest rules and entry info is here.

Now go enter!

March Madness

No, not that March Madness. This March Madness...

LJ friend Denise Jaden (and real, live friend, too, since we've actually met in person and had an intelligent conversation over dinner) and some of her writing friends are hosting a writing March Madness. If you need some accountability this month, then sign up and join in the fun! Here's a direct link: http://denisejaden.livejournal.com/44737.html (Oh, I forgot to mention...there will be prizes! Real prizes, like free books!)

I'll try to remember to play along (I'm terrible at checking in, which I gather is part of the accountability thing for this Nano-esque contest). But since I had a lovely chat with Agent Man last week about the first draft of a new book I sent him, I'm ready to do some revising. I'm hoping Denise and Co. can keep me motivated.

Hope to see you there!

Long or Short?

I'm wondering...which type of post do you prefer reading?

Short and sweet?

Long and lovely?

Who cares about length, as long as it is (fill in the blank)?

As for me, at first glance I prefer the short ones. But then I find myself writing these terribly long posts and I wonder if anyone else scrolls to the end and whines "Oh, maaaan. Not another long-winded writer. I hope this post is worth the read."

(For the record, I know mine are.)

(Don't argue with me on this.) :)